Yesterday, atA?aA?jazz research seminar at the University of Salford, the discussion focused on Alex Lubet”s recent book Music, Disability and Society (Temple University Press, 2010).
Towards the end of chapter 2–Let”s Face the Music and Dance”–Lubet writes that theA?possibilities for jazzA?musicians with disabilities to pursue successful careers is due to “…jazz performance practice, whose essence is the embrace of difference…” (p.65).
Lubet attributes this openness to the interpretive latitudes of jazz performance (“itsA?emphasis on highly original interpretation,” p.54)A?and a very specific kind of virtuosity, which valuesA?a musician”s unique and idiosyncratic approach toA?her or hisA?instrument (the distinctive soundA?she or heA?achieves), making it possible for musicians with physical impairments to participate at the highest levels.
This seems to me to be aA?workable definition of jazz for a project such asA?Rhythm Changes,A?which aims to understand the relationship betweenA?jazz and cultural identity.
What do you think?